@article{nokey,

title = {Reconsidering the Southern European Model: Marital Status, Women’s work and labour relations in mid-eighteenth century Portugal},

author = {Filipa Ribeiro da Silva and Hélder Carvalhal},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

urldate = {2020-01-01},

journal = {Revista de Historia Económica. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History},

volume = {38},

issue = {1},

pages = {45–77},

abstract = {Challenging current ideas in mainstream scholarship on differences between female labour force participation in southern and north-western Europe and their impact on economic development, this article shows that in Portugal, neither marriage nor widowhood prevented women from participating in the labour market of mid-eighteenth-century. Our research demonstrates that marriage provided women with the resources they needed to work in various capacities in all economic sectors.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {The Semiotics of Serfdom: How serfdom was perceived in the Swedish conglomerate state, 1561–1806},

author = {Marten Seppel},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

urldate = {2020-01-01},

journal = {Scandinavian Journal of History},

volume = {45},

issue = {1},

pages = {48-70},

abstract = {While serfdom did not exist in Sweden and Finland, it was accepted in the Baltic and German provinces. The main aim of the paper is to explore how the institution of serfdom was understood and interpreted in Stockholm. It will argue that there were clichés, stereotypes, and prejudices that have shaped the discourse on serfdom.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Their Most Valuable and Most Vulnerable Asset: Slaves on the Early Sugar Plantations of Saint-Domingue (1697-1715)},

author = {Klaus Weber and Karsten Voss},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Global Slavery},

volume = {5},

issue = {2},

pages = {204-237},

abstract = {From 1698, colonial officers and investors from France forged a conglomerate of companies for transforming Saint-Domingue into a sugar colony, thus augmenting incomes of tax farmers and of the crown. Capital was also captured from enemy colonies and generated through trade with Spanish possessions. The most important capital were slaves, both as laborers and mortgageable property—crucial during the War of Spanish Succession, which brought price volatility and speculation in land and sugar. In order to secure the colony’s development, authorities restricted rights of owners over their slaves, preventing their sale or abuse. Only around 1715 was such protection of slaves suppressed.





},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Il lavoro militare nella prima età moderna (xvi-xvii sec.): soldati, guastatori e galeotti tra subordinazione e agency},

author = {Giulio Ongaro },

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

issuetitle = {L’empreinte domestique du travail},

journal = {MEFRIM: Italie et Méditerranée modernes et contemporaines},

volume = {131},

issue = {1},

pages = {15-27},

abstract = {The article aims at demonstrating that “domesticity” remained a fundamental element in the enrollment of men and, broadly, in the functioning of the military structure in spite of a supposed process of “nationalisation” of the armied between the early modern and the contemporary period. In this context, it also focuses on the agency of the soldiers, analysing different practices that affected the military structure and, broadly, the social context in which soldiers were placed.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {From Persecution to (Potential) Emancipation: Female Slaves and Legal Violations in Ottoman Istanbul according to Court Registers (16th-17th Centuries)},

author = {Hayri Gökşin Özkoray},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Hawwa: Journal of Women of the Middle East and the Islamic World},

volume = {17},

issue = {2-3},

pages = { 257-280},

abstract = {This article deals with offences and crimes against female slaves, and those committed by female slaves, in Ottoman Istanbul (sixteenth-seventeeth centuries). Its main sources are imperial legislation and court records of the imperial capital, Istanbul, and its suburbs. Judicial archives remain the chief sources of early modern Ottoman historiography on gender. This contribution tackles slavery’s specificities regarding women, without ignoring the parallels with their male counterparts in the Ottoman Empire. By considering women as both objects and agents of legal violations and acts of violence, I simultaneously deal with the rights of slaveholders and slaves. Violations of these rights varied depending on the identity and juridical status of their authors, and were handled accordingly by the justice system. Thus, I consider violations committed by owners against their slaves, by slaves against their owners, and by third parties against the slaves of others. The rights and mutual obligations of masters and slaves were strictly defined in Ottoman law, although the judicial authorities upheld the preservation of private property above all. They dedicated themselves to fighting against the slightest doubt over masters’ quasi-absolute authority over their human possessions, whose unconditional obedience was required. Female slaves, in order to affirm their rights, had to provide irrefutable written proof or trustworthy verbal testimonies at the kadi courts.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Tko se buni pod Susedgradom i Stubicom? Prilog proučavanju društvenih nemira 1565.–1573. [Who is rebelling at Susedgrad and Stubica? Contribution to the research of the 1565–1573 peasant revolts]},

author = {Branimir Brgles},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

urldate = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Povijesni priloz},

volume = {55},

pages = {139-204},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}